Backstories people!

Sent.

Damn. Not an easy scenario to hash out. Haha. Way to make the DM sweat.

Okay. Update is up, now for the mechanics.

Between Malagaar, Arimm and Canicus, the second zombie managed to hit the dirt. That leaves one zombie standing. A zombie who, by the way, managed to smoke Arimm for 7 damage.

In other news, Tyrvia managed to heal Malagaar for 11hp.

I gotta say, philly, I am already really into this game. You got the GM gift. lol

It's funny, but iPhone has revolutionized my update speed. Haha. I've also had to add a house rule to deal with illegal spaces in combat now. Forced grapples!!! Haha. Though beyond this particular encounter I'm not sure how often it'll come up. That was a tricky one.

Is the remaining zombie the one Canicus scorched earlier, or is that the one we just took down?

That's the purple and black zombie crisp indeed.

he will be dead shortly..... well, dead again.

I truly appreciate Pathfinder's fresh take on the rogue.

Alright. Arimm and Canicus managed to take out the wounded zombie, and Malagaar spotted a way up to the temple. Next stop, Temple of DOOM!!!! Haha. Hmmmm...

I think Malagaar and Arimm will not get along very well at this rate. Apart from the obvious moral differences of course!

Wondering for roleplay reasons, would I have noticed his ease with killing by now?

Edit: As in, during my time working with him as a Blade.

not my place to say, as i ain't GM... But assuming we have been in even 1 prior battle, Arimm's ease in killing, even his enjoyment in it, would be fully apperant.
He doesn't hide it. Killing is all he lives for, and he will admit it in any number of philisophical ways.

(Assuming Malagaar and Arimm ever bothered to have a conversation, it would have even been voiced that he would kill any number of people considered allies if his king gave him the go ahead.)

At this point, it would be obvious that the only reason Arimm is even still with the blades, rather than a prisoner of them, is that he is loyal to the King, and will do whatever he can to keep everyone else alive. (If for no other reason than that they help further the King's cause, and by extention, Arimm's.)


EDIT: (And, I'll add, though no one would know in-character, that his loyalty to the kingis hardly even loyalty by usual standards. More that working for the King grants special privilages that are otherwise unavailable to Arimm, and so, even if an opportunity presented itself, he would not likely kill the King.)

Not my place to say as GM. Though I will say, that this is not your first shindig. How the two of you, or all of you in fact, interact I would welcome you all to explore privately and allow it to enrich the story line. In fact if you want to make specific examples of fighting side by side and being faced with moral paradigms, I'd say you could provide the example, and perhaps I could provide the name of the place or battle. Though you've all been with the blades around six months. To quantify things.

Then I feel it would be fair to say there is a little trust issue to say the least between the two. If salvator agrees.